... reasonable care in the preparation of the product to avoid causing foreseeable harm, therefore the House of Lords held that the manufacturer of the beer was liable for the injuries caused to someone who drank the beer even though they had not purchased the beer. This was also a major milestone in the evolution of the law of negligence. It may not necessarily be only the manufacturer that has a case to answer for as regards to Alan receiving injury to his hand. It may be asked whether the chemist had known about any faults in the camera before it was sold and if so, did they believe that the defects would cause injury. It may be difficult to proves this but it could follow the path of an Australian case Langridge v Levy (1837) where a father had bargained with the defendant to purchase a gun of him, for the ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now