... it"....He means he binds himself to it. That is the meaning it has borne in English for 300 years from the leading case of Chandelor v Lopus (1603)' Silence is not normally considered a misrepresentation but there are a group of contracts known as uberrimae fidei (of the fullest confidence) where it would be considered that the 'promisee is bound to communicate to the promisor every fact and circumstance which may influence him in deciding to enter into the contract or not.' ii) The misrepresentation must have induced the contract. At this stage Mr Scott, I do not know if you have anything that could constitute a contract with Mr Lyman, e.g. if you have anything in writing. Moreover in order for us to take action against Mr Lyman we will need to prove that he gave you a false or inaccurate picture of the standard of guarding on the machinery. Obviously ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now