... part of the contract. The ticket was not the sort of document on which a contract term would be expected. It appeared merely to be proof that Mr Chapleton had paid his 2d hire charge. Assuming that Robert and Lucy paid for the class on booking, the receipt could be seen to be only a 'proof of purchase' as in Chapleton v Barry UDC and not one in which they would be expected to turn over to see if any writing was present on the back. This case however differs slightly as the terms and conditions are only referred to by this ticket, they are not actually incorporated on it. In Thompson v LM&S Railway (1930) we see that it is not necessary for the document or sign itself to contain the terms. There may be incorporation by reference to where the terms may be found. If the contract was said ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now