... at least 100. Security agreed. That means there had been a bilateral contract exist between the two sides, i.e. Security must supply the cameras as well as Warehouse had to pay the money. But Security Ltd. refused to supply the goods to the Warehouse. They broke the existing contract. In law, if there is a contract existing between two parties, that means both of them have make the promise to another party. Therefore, both of them have to carry out the promise until it finished. There was a similar situation happened in the case of Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball co. In which the defendant made a unilateral contract to its customer to promise pay £100 after using their smoke ball. But they did not fulfil the promise after their product causing problems. The court said that they have to pay the £100 to their customer as it had been ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now