... presumably wealthy; studious, methodical, possesses an incredible recall and grasp of the facts of the case; common-sensical which is more of objective, dispassionate, cool-headed and rational and yet stuffy and prim. This often displays a stern glare; treats the case like a puzzle to be deductively solved rather than as a case that may send the defendant to death and claims that he never sweats. Jury # 4 states that the boy's entire alibi was 'flimsy." He claimed that he was at the movies at the time of the killing, yet one hour later, he couldn't remember the names of the films he saw or who played in them. And no one saw him going in or out of the theatre. Later on, Jury # 8 attacks this jury's own ability to recollect small details. After seeing Twelve Angry Men, we breathe a sigh of relief when we see that one ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now