... either the ruler or the fellow-member of the community."1 Clearly, by this, Aristotle believed committing injustice is not good for another, and it can be denoted that to suffer injustice is better. True justice comes only from a virtuous disposition, and true justice is concerned with another's good. Unlike Aristotle's measures of virtue and vice, injustice is a whole of vice, encompassing both extremes. Hence, one committing an act of injustice is not in accordance with Aristotle's definition of being virtuous; the act is not aligned with what is good for the entire community. I believe Aristotle referred to Universal Justice (the whole of its virtue) in application to his belief. Virtue develops from desire, deliberation, and intention, where justice becomes a moral standard. Morally, and those with virtue would not commit an injustice. But we must also apply Particular justice when regarding the meaning of Aristotle's principle, as Universal Justice ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now