... assuring fans and the press that she was on the road to recovery, Miss Campbell argued that the information printed in the paper and the intrusion into her private life caused a breach of confidence and was in no way of public interest. In the original hearing, 'modest' damages were awarded to Campbell ruling that there was "no overriding public interest in the publication."1 I will now go on to discuss the findings of both the first hearing of 2002 and the 2004 Court of Appeal hearing to assist with my appraisal of the named case. Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers [2002] At the original hearing of the Campbell case in 2002, Judge Moorland stated that: 'In order for Miss Campbell to establish her claim in breach of confidentiality, she must first establish three matters.'2 The first point that had to be proved was that the details published by the mirror group had the ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now