-
Discuss the way an NHS poster constructs subject positions and relations through the use of visual and verbal techniques. How does this relate to Fairclough's ideas about relationship between advertising and bureaucratic discourse?
... main purposes: to deter fraud, to gain public support and to establish an anti-fraud culture. Using Norman Fairclough's discourse theories, I discuss verbal and visual techniques. Within the first two aims I consider how subject positions and relations are constructed, ...
-
Discuss to What Extent the Polygraph is a Responsible and Reliable Tool to Determine Deceit in Police Interrogation.
... as the CIA, the National Security Agency and the FBI to use them to screen job applicants. In fact they are accepted there as a way of life. In the UK, their use is much less frequent. Only the occasional ...
-
Discuss whether it is still appropriate to use juries in serious criminal cases and in civil cases such as defamation.
... Denning commented on this factor in the English legal system when he said that the judicial process gave 'Ordinary folk their finest lesson on citizenship'. This is very true, as now we are no longer required to serve in the ...
-
Discuss whether or not the doctrine of precedent allows for the law to develop to meet the changing needs of society.
... exceptions have been developed. In the case of Young v Bristol Aeroplane (1944) the Court of Appeal laid out a list of circumstances where they can depart from its own previous decisions. The first was if the decision clashes with ...
-
Discuss whether the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent allows Judges flexibility in developing the law
... decided, the Judge may refuse to follow the earlier case ration when, "it appears right to do so". An example of this is the case of Herrington V British Railways Board (1972), which involved the law on the duty of ...
-
Discuss whether the use of juries should be abolished
... is called a 'hung jury', and the defendant is then acquitted.
There are many advantages of using juries. Jurors are independent of the executive and the judiciary; and with 12 people any bias is likely to be cancelled out. Many judges ...
-
Disenchantment, the Iron Cage, and Law.
... or go out with a few of my mates. But I can't - I have to do this essay.
Well, actually I don't have to. I could pack up my things, walk out the door, and do all of the things ...
-
Dispute Solving - Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives
... rate. 2nd 6 months is paid at national minimum rate
Can stay for longer than 1 year but will still only receive same rate of pay
Called to 'Bar' to receive certificate
2 types of barrister; Junior and QC
Chambers
Must get into chambers within ...
-
Distinguish between a lay magistrate and a district judge (magistrate's court) and describe how each is appointed.
... magistrate should sit for at least 26 1/2 days each year and endeavour to be available to sit up to 35 1/2 days each year. They come from all walks of life and do not usually have any legal qualifications ...
-
Distinguish between Law and Morality.
... rules are not subject to deliberate creation, abolition or change: legal and other changes may cause changes in public attitudes, as in the case of laws legalising homosexuality or prohibiting various forms of discrimination, but nothing can bring about an ...
-
Distinguish between personal licences over land and proprietary interests in land. Show how this definition has been affected by the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. Illustrate your answer with examples from the case law.
... law has given us.
A licence can be defined as the permission which prevents one's act of entering another's land4 being trespass. Put simply, it is a way in which a person may enjoy some right or privilege over the land ...
-
Distinguish Criminal law from Civil law in the English Legal System. Outline the jurisdiction and composition of the courts of trial dealing with these two different types of cases.
... court as in a magistrates and crown court the evidence has to be proved beyond doubt and in a civil court evidence can be proved on a balance of probabilities.
Criminal and civil cases are dealt with in different courts ...
-
Divorce Law
... a fair result. Section 25 of the Act since its amendment in 1984 however expresses no obvious objective, and the extensive range of 'all circumstances' which the court is required to undertake does not essentially give clear guidance as to ...
-
Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (
... be made by a court of sufficient seniority. Basically, judges at the lowest tiers of decision making (often called courts of first instance), are not allowed to issue binding precedents. Often, the cases are not fully reported anyway, so it ...
-
Do Judges Make New Law in Hard Cases?
... Oxford University on Hart's resignation. Some believe Hart resigned as a result of the criticism aimed at him by Dworkin.
The majority of cases that arrive before a judge are uncontentious and a result is arrived at by applying the existing ...
-
Do subcultural theories offer convincing explanations for group offending by young men and women today? Are there any other theoretical perspectives which you may consider to be useful and relevant?
... society. These groups are the boys' gangs that flourish most conspicuously in the 'delinquency neighbourhoods' of our large American cities.
(Cohen, 1955: 13)
Chicago sociologists focused on the motivations of delinquents. They argued that there is nothing 'wrong' with delinquents - they ...
-
Do we agree with Lord Diplock's view that the British Constitution is firmly based on the separation of powers?
... three main classes of governmental functions: the legislative, the executive and the judicial.
* There are (or should be) three main organs of government in a State: the Legislature the Executive and the Judiciary.
* To concentrate more than on class of ...
-
Do you agree with the contention that the law on insanity is outdated, unfair and in urgent need of reform?
... not have simply failed to do so e.g. in Clarke (1972) a lady in a supermarket was accused of shoplifting as she left the shop without paying for a jar of mincemeat. She claimed that her suffering from depression had ...
-
Do You Consider that the Introduction of the Citizen's Charter/Service First Initiatives Over the Past Decade Have Made Any Improvements to the Law of Public Administration ?
... access and the promotion of choice; treat all fairly; put things right when they go wrong; use resources effectively; innovate and improve; and work with other providers.4 Examples of charters include the introduction by the Inland Revenue of the 'Taxpayers' ...
-
Do You Consider that the Introduction of the Citizen's Charter/Service First Initiatives Over the Past Decade Have Made Any Improvements to the Law of Public Administration ?
... access and the promotion of choice; treat all fairly; put things right when they go wrong; use resources effectively; innovate and improve; and work with other providers.4 Examples of charters include the introduction by the Inland Revenue of the 'Taxpayers' ...
-
doctrine of precedent
... based his decision. It is part of the judgement which is capable of forming a binding precedent which means they must followed in later cases. It is important to realize that the ratio decidendi has nothing to do with the ...
-
Doctrine of Precedent and the Hierarchy of the Courts.
... them.
There are three types of precedent. They are binding, persuasive and original precedent. Binding precedent is when decisions made in previous cases must be followed later even if the judges do not agree with the principle in it. It ...
-
Doctrine of precedent.
... trends, thus indicating the next logical step in evolving applicable interpetations of the law. When a precedent becomes of significant importance to an issue, or represents new or changed law in a particular issue, that precedent is often referred to ...
-
Does English Law Recognise a Duty to Bargain in Good Faith?
... give rise to fiduciary duties: insurance contracts are held to be 'uberrimae fidei' ('of the utmost good faith') and will be voidable without full disclosure (Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society).
The law also takes an economic perspective in requiring full disclosure ...
-
Does the coronial jurisdiction provide the missing link in the criminal justice system for victims, society and the search for truth?
... system for victims, society and the search for truth? At the moment the coronerships under reform for several reasons but why, in this paper there will be a critical review of coroners and why the government has had to undertake ...