... period for at least ten years from the date of its entry into force." 3) "This Act of Parliament may be repealed only if the repealing measure gains a two-thirds majority on its third reading in the House of Commons" 4) "This Act of Parliament may only be repealed if, in addition to gaining the assent of the crown, the House of Lords, and the House of Commons, the repealing measure has the written assent of three quarters of the residents of Lancashire" Further more, if the Lancashire Parliament Bill had contained any of the above provisions, would the Queen have been entitled to refuse the Bill of Royal Assent. Answer This is a typical question on Parliamentary Supremacy. The problem lie behind the question is if the UK Queen-in-Parliament able to prescribe special procedures for the passing of future legislation which could be made binding on future Parliament. There are four ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now