-
Assisting a trustee's breach of fiduciary duty.
... Nicholls in Tan stated that dishonesty is the touchstone of liability for knowing assistance (at para.387). The decision of the Privy Council in Tan and its acceptance by the House of Lords in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley and others [1999] ...
-
At trial the prosecution have to prove Actus Reus, including causation and Mens Rea. Explain what is meant by these three terms
... actus rues then the defendant must be under a duty to act and examples of this can be contract (i.e. employment) and special relationships. The case of R v Gibbins & Proctor (1918) illustrates the special relationship duty. In this ...
-
‘Even after judicial attempts to clarify the principles governing liability for psychiatric harm…loose ends remain.’ (Street on Torts) Discuss.
... their insistence of wide principles in order to maintain control over the wide-ranging circumstances in which psychiatric claims arise.
Before examining the principles and case law in regards to psychiatric liability, it is necessary to highlight that there are arguably ...
-
âconcurrent liabilityâ(TM) in tort and contract.
... tort as the contractual limitation period has expired. E.g. Lancashire v Howard Seddon it was held that 'There could in law be a duty of care actionable in the tort of negligence where the parties were in a contractual professional ...
-
BOUNDARIES BETWEEN OLA 1957 AND OLA 1984
... c?mm?n l?w c?nc?pt? ?f duty, br??ch, c?u??ti?n ?nd r?m?t?n??? mu?t b? c?n?id?r?d in ?rd?r f?r li?bility t? ?n?u? vi? ? vi? th? ?p?cific pr?vi?i?n? ?f th? tw? ?t?tut?? - i.?. th? 1957 ?ct ?nd th? 1984 ?ct.
Di?cu??i?n
Th? ...
-
Breach of statutory duty- tort law
... a common law duty of care in negligence as set out in X (minors) v. Bedfordshire County Council1. Most statutes do not expressly state whether or not individuals have the right of action in the case of breach of statutory ...
-
Burglary deception, and making off without payment.
... who has permission to enter a building for particular purposes but then exceeds the express or implied conditions of entry will be a trespasser.
So whilst the defendant would normally have permission to enter the department store at any time ...
-
Business Law Negligence
... years ago in which they were told to do so which could have prevented injury. A failure to act could lead to a liability to claim. This could go either way, depending on the facts of the cause. Here I ...
-
Case Note - Hunter Area Health v Preston
... Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 19901.
The issue here is should the respondent receive a financial benefit due to duty of care owed to him. Adams J the trial judge originally awarded damages of $225,000 general damages and $113,300 for economic ...
-
Case Study - Hunter Area Health Service & Anor v Presland
... a non-physical injury suffered by the respondent from deprivation of his liberty when it is traced back to his unlawful conduct.
- 2 -
Spigelman found the plaintiff was owed a duty to provide proper care with respect to diagnosis and, subject ...
-
Causation and Remoteness.
... judgments and policy decisions.
It may be wrong however, to hold one responsible for all consequences of negligence. Sometimes, the outcome is freak or unusual and as such, it may not entirely be fair to put blame and accountability solely ...
-
Causation may be broken by a supervening act. To what degree does a supervening act have to be to break the chain of causation?
... the place by leaving the door open.
Causation is usually a case of common sense. However, it is a matter of law in complex situations. Each situation must be assessed individually; the players, the situation, the acts done, the omissions all ...
-
Chester v Afshar case study
... the only alternative in the hope of improving her condition at that point. After a consultation of 45 minutes, Mr Afshar managed to convince Miss Chester that three intraverterbral discs were the main source of the problem, and thus needed ...
-
Comparitive substantive law
... no duty of care, as they believed the claimant should have checked the scaffolding before using it. There was no negligent act of the scaffolding company that resulted in the harm.
The basis of the Donoghue v Stevenson 3 case was ...
-
Consider the following cases: Boltonv. Stone; The Wagon Mound (No.2); Latimer v. AEC; Parisv. StepneyBC . How far did the judges in those cases rely on the type of analysis proposed by Hand J.?
... against the interest which he must sacrifice to avoid the risk. All these are practically not susceptible of any quantitative estimate, and the second two are generally not so, even theoretically. For this reason a solution always involves some preference, ...
-
Consider the relationship between the torts of private nuisance and negligence and in doing so answer both the following points: (a) To what extent, if at all, have the distinctions between private nuisance and negligence been eroded by case-law developm
... arising in the thirteenth century. However with the emergence of the tort of negligence in the nineteenth century many have argued that the tort of private nuisance has been taken over by the tort of negligence and now forms a ...
-
Consider what is meant by âconcurrent liabilityâ in tort and contract. Using examples from decided cases examine how such liabilities can arise, and how the courts have dealt with the issue of the interrelationship between obligations in these t
... and lease- particular instances- occupation of premises- or particular purpose- accommodation for mistress and children.' The court found that the defendant had given good consideration for the licence, it was not revocable at will, and the plaintiff could have been ...
-
Consider what offences, if any, have been committed.
... but leaves it to Frank to rescue Ellen, has not taken any steps to correct this mistake and thus his omission can constitute an act.
Frank could be charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent contrary to s.18 of the ...
-
Consider why and in what circumstances the courts recognise the existence of crimes of strict and absolute liability.
... offences but in the eyes of the law are classed as quasi criminal. The punishments for strict liability offences are often fines with no custodial sentence, strict liability offences are not seen to be "truly criminal" and therefore there is ...
-
Currently, a need in revaluation of the principles of tort law appeared. Mainly, it is connected with the new view on the notion of guilt. Several works address the issue of guiltiness and the guiltiness of victim
... improve fairness on decisions taken. The paper will also address some fundamental works and different points of view on the problem.
Contributory Negligence
In order to address the issue properly it is worthwhile examining a very simple situation that is rather common ...
-
Defamation Law
... woman, dear my lord.
Is the immediate jewel of their souls.
Who steals my purse steals trash;
`Tis something, nothing;
`Twas mine, `tis his, and has been slave to thousands;
But he that filches from me my good name
Robs me of that which not enriches ...
-
Defences to Negligence & Vicarious liability.
... tempered by UCTA.
*Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6
The Plaintiff got into an aeroplane with the Defendant. The Defendant had consumed an exceptionally large quantity of alcohol. They died in the ensuing crash. It was decided that the risks had ...
-
Describe the elements of the Tort of Negligence and critically analyse their practical applications.
...
The elements that make the tort of negligent valid or actionable are that 1. it should be proved that the tortfeasor owed the claimant a duty of care, 2. that by negligent conduct the defendant broke this duty of care, ...
-
Development of Psychiatric Harm as Actionable Loss.
... a participant, and those in which the [claimant] was no more than the passive and unwilling witness of injury caused to others. (Lord Oliver, emphasis added)
1 Primary Victims
The term primary victim is now used to connote those in the 'zone of ...
-
Discuss in what circumstances the action for breach of statutory duty is available. Do you agree that it is difficult to identify any intelligible principles in this area?
... of a statutory duty may be raised in conjunction with, but distinct of that of a breach of duty at common law as stated by Lord Wright2 who said "A claim for damages for breach of a statutory duty....may stand ...